Beauty is The Politically Correct Public Presentation of the Pageant's Image

Well, Miss California, you answered honestly a politically-charged question from the personal agenda of a homosexual judge at a beauty contest, and that is not in keeping with the Pageant's Public Persona. Your personal honesty apparently conflicts with the "not just a beauty contest" Pageant image. We cannot refer to you as a beauty queen as you are so much more, but not that much more when it comes to Stepfording your way across the state. Your role, perhaps because your beauty prohibits your brain from functioning, is to do as you are told and to say what you are told to say.

Miss California stepped out of that Pageant programming, so she will pay a very public price for expressing her personal opinion on an issue that never should have been part of the Pageant process. Did not one Pageant representative vet the judge? Was not even one person aware of this Pageant judge's aggressive use of his personal agenda to further his internet media career? Were not the judge's questions submitted for review prior to being asked on TV? Cannot the Pageant understand that it is responsible for the massive negative media exposure created by its own failure to prepare for and protect its contestants from this kind of manipulation?

It's not the contestant's response that is at issue: it's that the question was not only asked, but validated by the Pageant's response to it.

In point of fact, the MAJORITY of Californians did NOT approve Prop 8, voting against same-sex marriage as a legal option for homosexual couples. The contestant's comment, that in her opinion marriage is a commitment between a man and a woman, is supported by the MAJORITY of the Californians who voted in the last election. The question, however, came from an individual who used his (homo)sexuality to promote his agenda in a very public manner designed to "out" the Pageant and/or contestant to whom the question was asked. While Miss California is being attacked for her "homophobic" remark about gay marriage, he is giggling about the public venue he exploited to bring the Pageant to its knees, basking in the limelight he turned on himself and his agenda by admitting that it was the response to his question that denied a contestant the crown. That's a lot of power handed to this individual by the Pageant: when one judge determines not just the outcome of the selection process, but the direction of the entire Pageant process, the Pageant may as well allow the viewers to phone in their votes.

No one dares to call his conduct into question: the price is too high for crossing that politically incorrect line. Miss California, however, is expendable because there are several runners-up eager to step into her stilettos.

By answering his question honestly, Miss California became a victim of the gay marriage coalition, as well as the Miss California Pageant that is now stripping her of her title. No matter how vocal and/or how vicious the attacks are against those who support heterosexual marriage, those who favor same-sex marriage remain in the minority. Using the Miss America Pageant as a tool for promoting a homosexual agenda is offensive to many, perhaps the majority of California voters, but no one dares to make that statement publicly!