Friday, March 20, 2009

Two Sides to a Coin -- or Three?

If AIG wanted to withhold those alleged retention bonuses from employees, it would be done. NO corporation allows its employees to sign air tight contracts that bind the employer to perform anything, anytime, anyway. There is always a "because I say no" clause in a contract as that's just the way the big boys play the game: they own the field, the ball, and the team, so they win. Every time.

If the government wanted to break the alleged contract, it would be a done deal. It is laughable that the federal government wants anyone to believe that they are powerless in this situation. The government could take over AIG and do with it -- and the employees -- what they will, so there is something going on at the highest need-to-know basis that precludes them from doing so. It has nothing to do with contracts, air-tight or cheesecloth, tied to employee retention bonuses.

AIG set these employees up to take the money and run, and will do nothing to stop that process, and, for reasons not yet known, the government is complicit in that action. But there is always a third side to the coin, evidenced by the fact that a two-sided coin can stand on its edge, and that's where the rest of us are these days. We are being lied to and manipulated for reasons that we may never know, reasons that may be tied to international politics and financial practices, and we may be paying the price for relying on outsiders to keep our economy intact, rather than living within our means. Once enough of the US's financial stability rests in the hands of foreign governments, the US no longer calls the shots.

It's a tricky situation, to lend and borrow money with the right people at the right time and for the right reasons, but the US benefited from the economic boom years regardless of who financed them. No one wants to do with less when they can have more, from the lone consumer to the huge corporations to the government itself. Instead of taking action to deal with the flagrant economic practices sanctioned by the government, such as the GAO's reports that showed multiple-millions in cost over-rides, we let it ride. Pay the bills, the Congress said, and pay the bills we did. Once we, the people, saw how the government did business, we began doing the same business within our own lives, living on credit, enjoying deficit spending, laughing at accountability.

How's that working for us now?

AIG saw the loophole and drove a truck through it when the government threw money at them. Had AIG been forced to accept funds with terms and conditions, they would have been fools to do so because there would have been contingencies and oversight attached. But when the government throws billions of dollars at failing businesses and trusts that the money will be well-spent, it's foolish not to create a failing business, take the money, and do with it what you will. Providing the cash to loyal employees in return for their participation in the financial manipulation is simply shrewd, albeit not very ethical, business practice.

The government, most notably Pelosi and Reid, decried the falling financial sky and demanded immediate action, which the media sold to the public, providing the foundation for the financial follies. Pelosi positioned herself as a forceful powerhouse in clear control of what happens in Washington; after all, she is second in line if anything happens to Obama. To every question, she had the same response, repeated so often that she became a parody, but people listened, believed, and reacted.

All I've heard for the past two weeks vis a vis the media outlets is "we should have taken more time to figure this out" before throwing money at a problem that maybe didn't exist and certainly has not responded to the cure. Misdiagnosis is what they call it in the medical profession, but the patient still has to pay for all the tests, all the treatments, and all the hospital stays associated with that failure to find and fix the original problem. The Republicans' call for a go-slow approach was poo-pooed because Pelosi and the Demos needed action NOW to publicly affirm their party's power. They let the tail wag the dog, and now that dog is biting them in the ass.

Lesson learned? Probably not, but maybe, once we get out of this mess, we'll have a few years of prosperity before the next crop of Arrogant, Inept, Greedy corporations get big enough to do it again.

2 comments:

John said...

It seems like you are blaming this somehow on the Demos and ignoring the 8 years of poor Rep management wherein they relaxed oversights, pushed for less legislation and accountability, and ultimately created this problem. Of course they wanted us to take it slow now-- they needed time to cover their asses and get in on the graft.

The problems with the government and America are caused by BOTH the Repubs and the Demos. The gov't has forgotten that, in a Democracy, the gov't should fear the people, not the people their gov't. It is time for a new revolution to remind them of this.

Until people stop following party politics (regardless of the party) and start thinking for themselves, holding their reps accountable, and electing the PERSON, not the party, that they think can best do the job, every 4 years will just be a different shade of the same color.

My hope is that Obama will bring about the same type of "sea change" that Reagan did in 1981 to gov't. He's trying, but both parties are fighting him on it. Of course, he's been in office, what, 100 days? Let's give him 6 months or a year before we start asking the hard questions (hell, we gave one of the worst Presidents ever, Bush Jr, two terms to "get it right;" the least we can do is give his replacement a year).

Liza said...

I reread my blog to be sure that I blamed we, the people, as well as the generic institution "the government" and financial institutions for the problems we are facing, not either the Dems, Reps, and/or the current President.

Yes, I have a thing about Pelosi and Reid, neither of whom is doing Obama any favors by the help they've provided so far, 60 days into his first term. I think she's dangerous because she's too malleable at the behest of people who truly have the power to make policy and benefit from it.

My whole point is that there is a lot more to this issue than Rep/Dem politics, and it starts with me and you and every other individual who comprises we, the people.

Yeah, I'm not too impressed with Obama, as I consider him to be a figurehead for a political machine with its own agenda, but I'm still entitled to that opinion in the land of the free and the home of the brave enough to put it in writing. So far, he's running a great ad campaign and his PR is touching every available media outlet, including late night TV.

Let me know when he does something that's not only Presidential, but in the best interest of ALL Americans and I'll start paying homage.